BenefitsAll

health insurance costs

We Should Not Reward Large Employers For Making Health Insurance More Expensive And Less Accessible For All


We expect private health insurers to be anti Medicare For All (M4A). Criticizing M4A proposals is just time and money to them, and they have plenty of both. They have no desire to reduce the cost and complexity of health insurance or health care. Besides, you can’t solve a problem that you do not think exists. Attacking something without coming up with a better solution is easy and unfair, but even these tactics would not work for private health insurers without the support of their major corporate clients. So why do major corporations back the health care status quo, and why do we reward corporations that don’t support affordable health care for all?

It’s A Bro Thing, A Control Thing, And A Money Thing

It was just over one year ago that
Amazon, Berkshire Hathaway, and JPMorgan Chase announced their joint health care venture. The three business giants said they were combining forces to “provide low-cost, high quality service from a (health care) company ‘free from profit-making incentives and constraints.” But soon after the announcement one of the Big 3, JPMorgan Chase CEO, Jamie Dimon, promised not to compete with private health insurers and would instead restrict the new venture’s efforts to helping the employees of the three companies. We know why Jamie tried to walk back his threat to upend private health insurance—some of his company’s clients are in the health care industry—but why do other major companies support the industry, and do not publicly support Medicare For All?

I can think of a few reasons.

Despite
surveys showing that health care costs are a major concern of all private companies, large companies seem to prefer private health insurance to a government-run or universal system. No major corporation has cut all ties with the health insurance status quo. Instead, corporations work with major health insurers to support each other's profits and shareholder returns at the expense of the country. Also, many leaders of “American industry” believe that they know more about health insurance and health care than health care policy analysts, government officials, and economists. They think the private sector is just generally better at running any business even if it has public policy implications. Continue Reading...

Comments

2014 - A Historic Year in Employee Benefits

bigstock-2014Affordable-Care-Act


Now is the time of year for every writer to create their Best Of list or make predictions for the upcoming year. However, for me 2014 was too extraordinary a year in health insurance and retirement plan public policy to reduce to simple lists. This year we witnessed the implementation of historic health insurance legislation reminiscent of the passage of the Social Security Amendments that created the Social Security and Medicare programs. We also saw many states and the federal government focus their policy power on expanding access to workplace retirement plans.

But if I absolutely have to sum up the year in employee benefits and give fellow benefits pros something to think about for next year, I would say don't forget the origins of your field. And if you think there is too much regulation of employee benefit plans then you forget that that is where benefits got its start. You forget that health insurance plan and retirement saving plans are part of state and federal tax code and social policy. And that is why as a Certified Employee Benefits Specialist (CEBS) with a master's degree in public policy, I am excited about the current employee benefits environment and its future.

However, not everything employee benefits related is exciting or good to me. Health insurance plan prices are still too high, even on the exchanges. Health insurance concepts are too complex. The ascension of high deductible health plans is a crisis in waiting. Health care prices are still hidden. Workplace retirement plans are also too complex and risky. Retirement plan fees are too high and employer matches too low. Workplace wellness programs are a failure for nearly everyone except the workplace wellness industry. And public pension plans are under attack due to jealousy as much as economics.
Continue Reading...
Comments

Employers Are Lousy Purchasers of Affordable Health Insurance

EmployerFail


Employees should take more responsibility for their health care and its costs. Every time I read statements like this I cannot help but add, now that employers have gotten us in this mess of out-of-control health insurance increases.

For decades, employers made all the decisions about what health plans employees would have access to and how much they would pay for it. Employers were the ones sitting down with health insurer representatives and reviewing current years claim data and health plan options for the upcoming year, and negotiating plan renewal costs. I digress, but if you ever participated in a health plan renewal meeting, you know that there isnt much negotiating going on.

Typical Health Plan Renewal Meeting

Insurer reps come armed with a script about why their underwriters are asking for a certain percentage increase. The usual suspects are actual claims, earned but not yet incurred claims, demographics (too many females at child bearing age or too many mature employees), and our good friend, medical trend. Hospitals and doctors are simply charging more for their services. And let
s not even talk about the trend for prescription drug costs.
Continue Reading...
Comments